| Status | Enacted Law |
| Law | On July 24, 2025, the Luxembourg Government issued: – a draft law to amend its Minimum Tax Law to provide for the January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance and the EU DAC 9 GIR filing requirements: and – a draft Regulation which includes the format of the GIR. On June 12, 2024, the Luxembourg Government published draft law amending the law of 22 December 2023 on the minimum effective taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large domestic groups. The draft law provides for a number of amendments in the December 2023 OECD Administrative Guidance. On October 31, 2024 additional amendments were made to the draft legislation to incorporate elements from the OECD June 2024 Administrative Guidance. The draft law was approved by Parliament on December 19, 2024 and published in the Official Gazette on December 23, 2024. On December 22, 2023, the Luxembourg Official Gazette published Law A864 to transpose the EU Minimum Tax Directive. Grand-Ducal Regulation of 22 December 2023 on the procedures for registration and deregistration, notification and filing of the information return for the supplementary tax with the Direct Tax Administration |
| Effective Date | Accounting periods beginning on or after December 31, 2023 |
| IIR | Yes (2024) |
| UTPR | Yes (2025) |
| QDMTT | Yes (2024) |
| Filing Deadlines | Standard |
| Safe Harbours | Transitional CbCR Safe Harbour; QDMTT Safe Harbour; Transitional UTPR Safe Harbour; Permanent Safe Harbour. |
On July 24, 2025, the Luxembourg Government issued:
– a draft law to amend its Minimum Tax Law to provide for the January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance and the EU DAC 9 GIR filing requirements: and
– a draft Regulation which includes the format of the GIR.
On June 12, 2024, the Luxembourg Government published draft law amending the law of 22 December 2023 on the minimum effective taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large domestic groups. The draft law provides for a number of amendments in the December 2023 OECD Administrative Guidance. On October 31, 2024 additional amendments were made to the draft legislation to incorporate elements from the OECD June 2024 Administrative Guidance. The draft law was approved by Parliament on December 19, 2024 and published in the Official Gazette on December 23, 2024.
On March 25, 2024, the Luxembourg Government issued a FAQ on its Pillar 2 law.
On December 22, 2023, the Luxembourg Official Gazette published Law A864 to transpose the EU Minimum Tax Directive.
Grand-Ducal Regulation of 22 December 2023 on the procedures for registration and deregistration, notification and filing of the information return for the supplementary tax with the Direct Tax Administration
On 20 December 2023, the Luxembourg Parliament voted to approve the draft law n°8292 transposing the EU Minimum Tax Directive.
On November 13, 2023, the Luxembourg Government issued amendments to update its draft law implementing the EU Minimum Tax Directive.
On 4 August 2023, the Luxembourg government issued Draft Law No. 8292 to implement the EU Minimum Tax Directive.
As provided in the EU Minimum Tax Directive, the Law confirms that taxpayers should use the GloBE Rules, the Pillar Two Commentary and the GloBE Administrative Guidance as sources of illustration or interpretation.
Whilst the original draft law did not include many aspects of the OECD Administrative Guidance, the final approved bill provides for a lot of the provisions.
The Law implements a transitional country-by-country report (CbCR) Safe Harbour in line with the GloBE Safe Harbours and Penalty Relief documentation. This aims to provide transitional relief for MNE groups operating in low-risk jurisdictions in the initial years during which the rules come into effect.
The UTPR Safe Harbour and the QDMTT Safe Harbour are included, as are the Simplified Calculation Safe Harbour and provisions for Non-Material Constituent Entities.
The Explanatory Notes to Article 20 of the Law provide that Luxembourg covered taxes include corporate income tax, municipal business tax and the net worth tax.
In general the provisions in the Luxembourg global minimum tax law closely follow the rules set out in the EU Global Minimum Tax Directive. However, the structure of the law is different to both the EU Directive and the GloBE Model Rules.
The differences are therefore minor.
Given the Luxembourg draft law is based on the EU directive, the scope of the global minimum tax also applies to domestic groups as well as international groups. As such, the definitions in the Model Rules relating to an MNE group including at least one entity or permanent establishment which is not located in the jurisdiction of the ultimate parent entity isn’t included in the Luxembourg draft law.
The Luxembourg law applies the UTPR via a separate additional tax. Therefore the specific requirements in the Model Rules and EU Directive that apply to UTPRs implemented as a denial of a deduction (eg Article 2.4.2) do not apply. As such, there is no equivalence to Article 2.4.2 of the OECD Model Rules in the Luxembourg law for the carry-forward of excess UTPR top-up tax.
Administrative Guidance
The November 2023 update to the draft law included numerous aspects of both the First and Second Set of OECD Administrative Guidance.
This includes:
-Forex hedge election (Article 2.2)
-Excluded Dividends – Asymmetric treatment of dividends and distributions (Article 2.3)
-Debt release election (Article 2.4)
-Accrued Pension Expenses (Article 2.5)
-Excess negative tax carry-forward guidance (Article 2.7)
-Substitute Loss-carry forwards (Article 2.8)
-Equity Gain or loss inclusion election (Article 2.9)
-Allocation of taxes arising under a Blended CFC Tax Regimes (Article 2.10)
-The extension of the taxable distribution method election to insurance investment entities (Article 3.1)
-Exclusion of Insurance Investment Entities from the definition of Intermediate Parent Entity and Partially-Owned Parent Entity (Article 3.2)
-The extension of Additional Capital to include Restricted Tier One Capital (Article 3.3)
-Portfolio shareholding election (Article 3.5)
-Tax Credits Guidance (MTTCs) (Article 2 Second Set of OECD Administrative Guidance) to be provided by Ducal Regulation
-SBIE Rules – Foreign rules (Article 3 Second Set of OECD Administrative Guidance)
The 2024 Tax Amendment Law includes all aspects of the Third and Fourth Set of OECD Administrative Guidance (some are subject to further Grand-Ducal Regulations).
Article 9 of the July 2025 Draft Law includes the amendments to Article 9.1.1 from the January 2025 OECD Administrative Guidance.
Safe Harbour and Penalty Relief Guidance
The Law implements a transitional country-by-country report (CbCR) Safe Harbour in line with the GloBE Safe Harbours and Penalty Relief Guidance. This aims to provide transitional relief for MNE groups operating in low-risk jurisdictions in the initial years during which the rules come into effect.
The final law also includes other Safe Harbours from the July 2023 Administrative Guidance and the OECDs Safe Harbours and Penalty Relief Guidance.
Transitional UTPR Safe Harbour
Section 58 of the law implements the Transitional UTPR Safe Harbour in Section 5.2 of the July 2023 Administrative Guidance.
This deems the UTPR Top-up Tax amount for a UPE Jurisdiction to be zero if the UPE Jurisdiction has a corporate income tax rate of at least 20 percent.
It applies for Fiscal Years which begin on or before 31 December 2025 and end before 31 December 2026.
The guidance to the law notes that Luxembourg, with a nominal corporate tax rate of at least 20 percent, should be eligible for this Safe Harbour if a UTPR, based on the law of another jurisdiction is likely to apply during the period in respect of Luxembourg constituent entities where the UPE of the MNE group is located in Luxembourg.
The 2024 Tax Amendment Law includes all amendments to the operation of the Transitional CbCR Safe Harbour in the Third Set of OECD Administrative Guidance.
QDMTT Safe Harbour
Article 14 of the law implements the QDMTT Safe Harbour in Article 5.1 of the July 2023 Administrative Guidance.
The QDMTT Safe Harbour excludes the application of the GloBE Rules in other jurisdictions by deeming the Top-up Tax payable under the GloBE Rules to be nil where top-up tax is levied under a QDMTT. The MNE Group therefore only needs to undertake one calculation.
However, this then opens up a risk that the QDMTT tax may be much less than any GloBE top-up tax that would have been due. This would undermine the international application of the GloBE rules.
Therefore, to qualify for the QDMTT safe harbour a QDMTT must meet three conditions specified in the July 2023 OECD Administrative Guidance (the QDMTT Accounting Standard, the Consistency Standard and the Administration Standard).
Some jurisdictions, (such as Germany) are including these requirements in their QDMTT legislation. Luxembourg takes a different approach and states that a jurisdictions QDMTT would only qualify for the QDMTT Safe Harbour if it qualified under the Inclusive Framework peer review process.
This would then imply that they have met the OECD Standards.
Permanent Safe Harbour
Article 32 of the law implements the permanent safe harbour, as provided in the OECD Safe Harbour and Penalty Relief Guidance – albeit with further work still be done.
Article 32 also reflects the Non-Material Constituent Entity provisions in the OECD Safe Harbour and Penalty Relief Guidance.
Elections
The law includes all of the key elections as provided in the OECD Model Rules, including:
– Excluded Entity Election (Section 2(3) of the law)
– Election to use the Realization Method (Section 16(6) of the law)
– Stock-Based Compensation Election (Section 16(3) of the law)
– Election to Spread Capital Gains (Section 16(7) of the law)
– Consolidation Election (Section 16(9) of the law)
– GloBE Loss Election (Section 23 of the law)
– Tax Transparency Election (Section 42 of the law)
– Taxable distribution Election (Section 43 of the law)
– Unclaimed Accrual Election (Section 22(1)(b) of the law)
– Distribution Tax Regime Election (Section 40(1) of the law)
– Substance-Based Income Exclusion Election (Section 28(2) of the law)
– Prior Year Adjustment Election (Section 25(1) of the law)
– De minimis Election (Section 30(1) of the law)
– Deemed Disposal Election (Section 35(5) of the law)
– Transitional CbCR Safe Harbour Election (Section 32(2) of the law)
Elections in the Administrative Guidance
All of the elections in the OECD Administrative Guidance are included. This includes the:
-Foreign Exchange Hedge Election (Section 16 of the law);
-Debt Release Election (Section 16 of the law).
-Portfolio Shareholding Election (Section 16 of the law);
-Excess Negative Tax Carry-Forward Election (Section 21 of the law);
-Equity Investment Inclusion Election (Section 16 of the law);
-QDMTT Safe Harbour Election (Section 14 of the law);
-UTPR Safe Harbour Election (Section 58 of the law).
Article 44 of the law includes a domestic minimum tax that is likely to be a QDMTT. This allows Luxembourg to levy top-up tax on the profits of low-taxed domestic entities of MNE groups.
The calculation of the QDMTT is relatively straightforward. In particular, it applies the Top-Up Tax calculated under the general GloBE rules and then subjects this to a very small number of adjustments.
Key points to note are:
– In order to avoid circularity, the top-up tax calculation formula for the QDMTT must be amended so that the QDMTT itself is not deducted. Article 44(2) of the Law provides for this.
– Tax paid or incurred by a Constituent Entity-owner under a CFC Tax Regime that is pushed down to a domestic Constituent Entity in the GloBE Rules must be excluded, as provided in the OECD Administrative Guidance. This is included in 44(5) of the Law.
– Article 44(5) of the Law also excludes taxes incurred by Hybrids (as provided in the second set of Administrative Guidance) and taxes on distributions (unless the tax charge is levied under Luxembourg tax law). The December 2024 Amendment Law also extends the restriction to Reverse Hybrids as stated in Article 5.6.2 of the June 2024 OECD Administrative Guidance.
– Article 44(6) of the Law provides that instead of using the UPEs accounting standard, MNEs calculate GloBE income for QDMTT purposes using Luxembourg Accounting Standards or IFRS. Article 11 of the 2024 Amendment law provides that the IFRS to be used in the event that several admissible financial accounting standards applicable in Luxembourg are used by the Constituent Entities of the Group, are the IFRS as adopted by the European Union in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards.
For this to apply all the constituent entities of the MNE or domestic group located in Luxembourg must prepare financial statements based on Luxembourg GAAP or IFRS, and their financial year must be the same as the consolidated financial statements.
If these conditions are not met, the domestic minimum tax is calculated:
-using the financial accounting standard of the ultimate parent entity, and,
-if that is not practicable, on the basis of an accepted or approved accounting standard, if:
o the constituent entity’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with that standard,
o the information contained in the financial statements is reliable; and
o permanent differences of more than EUR 1 million are conformed with the UPEs accounting standard.
– Article 11 of the 2024 Tax Amendment Law provides that where all the Constituent Entities in the jurisdiction use Luxembourg GAAP and the euro as their functional currency, the QDMTT requires the relevant computations in euros.
However, if not all Constituent Entities in the jurisdiction use euros as their functional currency, the Filing Constituent Entity may make a Five-Year Election to undertake the QDMTT computations for all Constituent Entities in the jurisdiction either:
– in the presentation currency of the Consolidated Financial Statements; or
– in euros.
– Article 44(4) of the Law provides that Top-up Tax under a QDMTT in respect of Joint Ventures and Minority-Owned Constituent Entities is the whole amount irrespective of the fact that the UPE would only be subject to tax on its share of the Top-up Tax arising from Joint Ventures, JV subsidiaries, MOCEs. This reflects the OECD Administrative Guidance.
– Article 11 of the 2024 Draft Tax Amendment Law applies the initial phase of international activity exemption for QDMTT purposes.
-The June 2024 OECD Administrative Guidance provides various options to jurisdictions that have implemented a QDMTT in respect of securitisation vehicles:
-(i) application of the jurisdiction’s QDMTT to securitisation vehicles without any specific adjustment of the rules;
-(ii) exclusion of securitisation vehicles from the scope of the QDMTT; or
-(iii) inclusion of securitisation vehicles in the scope of the QDMTT while providing that the amount of QDMTT that has been determined for a securitisation vehicle is imposed on another Constituent Entity located in the same jurisdiction and forming part of the same MNE Group.
Article 12(3) of the 2024 Draft Tax Amendment Law applies option (iii). However, if there are no other constituent entities located in Luxembourg, the amount of QDMTT for a securitisation vehicle is allocated for the purposes of the payment of the QDMTT to the securitisation vehicle itself.
– There are therefore very few adjustments for the Luxembourg QDMTT. The OECD Administrative Guidance allows for more flexibility for the QDMTT design, but the Luxembourg QDMTT is very similar to top-up tax for GloBE purposes. For instance, the OECD Administrative Guidance provides that:
– The QDMTT can be more restrictive than the GloBE Rules where the tighter restriction is consistent with local tax rules.
– The GloBE Loss Election, Substance-Based Income Exclusion and De Minimis rules do not need to be included.
For Luxembourg QDMTT purposes none of these adjustments are made and the general GloBE rules apply.
Filing
The relevant aspects of the submission of a GloBE Information Return (GIR) are included, as provided in the OECD Guidance.
The proposed approach is that every Constituent Entity located in Luxembourg will have an obligation to file a GIR in Luxembourg. However, this obligation can be discharged if the GIR is filed by:
– The Ultimate Parent Entity, or
– The Designated Filing Entity.
Where the GIR is being filed by either the Ultimate Parent Entity or the Designated Filing Entity, the Constituent Entity, must file a notification with the Revenue.
The notification must contain:
– Details of the entity that is filing the GIR, and
– The jurisdiction in which such an entity is located.
Where the GIR is filed by the Designated Local Entity it needs to outline the Constituent Entities that it is filing on behalf of.
Both the GIR and associated notifications must be filed no later than 15 months after the end of the fiscal year (with an 18-month deadline for the Transition Year).
Section 51 of the law also requires submission of an additional domestic top-up tax return and self- assessment return (referred to as a ‘GloBE Top-Up Tax Return’) where top-up tax is payable. The same filing deadline applies for the GloBE Top-Up Tax Return as for the GloBE Information Return.
Article 10 of the July 2025 Draft Law includes the Transitional Simplified Reporting Election from the OECD GloBE Information Return Guidance. The Draft Law also implements the EU DAC 9 amendments. This simplifies reporting in-scope groups by enabling central filing of a top-up tax information return (TTIR) and introduces a standard form for filing the TTIR across the EU, in line with the GIR.
Payment
The top-up tax liabilities must be paid within one month of filing the GloBE Top-Up Tax Return under Section 51(5)(b) of the law (i.e. 15 months after the end of the Fiscal Year, extended to 18 months in the first year).
Penalties
Sections 51 and 52 of the law governs the application of interest and penalties.
Section 51(5)(f) provides that late payment of top-up tax incurs interest under Article 155 of the Income Tax Law.
Specific penalties are not provided, however, Section 52 applies the general penalty provisions in the law on the collection of direct taxes.
None issued.
| Luxembourg | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Effective Date: | Accounting periods beginning on or after December 31, 2023 | ||
| Section/Article | |||
| First Set of OECD Administrative Guidance | |||
| 1.1 | Rebasing monetary thresholds in the GloBE Rules | Regulation to be issued | |
| 1.2 | Deemed consolidation test | – | |
| 1.3 | Consolidated deferred tax amounts | 22 | |
| 1.4 | Sovereign wealth funds and the definition of Ultimate Parent Entity | Amendment law, Art 1 | |
| 1.5 | Clarifying the definition of ‘Excluded Entity’ | – | |
| 1.6 | Meaning of ancillary for Non-Profit Organisations | Amendment law, Art 1 | |
| 2.1 | Intra-group transactions accounted at cost | Amendment law, Art 9 | |
| 2.2 | Excluded Equity Gains or Loss and hedges of investments in foreign operations | 16 | |
| 2.3 | Excluded Dividends- Asymmetric treatment of dividends and distributions | 16 | |
| 2.4 | Debt release Election | 16(12) | |
| 2.5 | Accrued Pension Expenses | 16 | |
| 2.6 | Covered Taxes on deemed distributions | – | |
| 2.7 | Excess Negative Tax Carry-forward guidance | 21 | |
| 2.8 | Substitute Loss carry forwards | 22 | |
| 2.9 | Equity Gain or loss inclusion election | 16 | |
| 2.9 | Qualified Ownership Interest/Flow through entity | 16 | |
| 2.1 | Allocation of taxes arising under a Blended CFC Tax Regimes | 57 | |
| 3.1 | Application of Taxable Distribution Method Election to Insurance Investment Entities | 43 | |
| 3.2 | Exclusion of Insurance Investment Entities from the definition of Intermediate Parent Entity and Partially-Owned Parent Entity | 3 | |
| 3.3 | Restricted Tier 1 Capital | Amendment Law, Art 4(2) |
|
| 3.4 | Liabilities related to Excluded Dividends and Excluded Equity Gain or Loss from securities held on behalf of policyholders | Amendment Law, Art 4 | |
| 3.5 | Simplification for Short-term Portfolio Shareholdings | 16 | |
| 3.6 | Application of Tax transparency election to Mutual insurance companies | Amendment Law, Art 10 | |
| 4.1 | Deferred tax assets with respect to tax credits under Article 9.1.1 | Amendment law, Article 15(1) | |
| 4.2 | Applicability of Article 9.1.3 to transactions similar to asset transfers | Amendment law, Article 15(2) | |
| 4.3 | Asset carrying value and deferred taxes under 9.1.3 | Amendment law, Article 15(2) | |
| Second Set of OECD Administrative Guidance | |||
| 1 | Currency conversion rules | Amendment law, Art 11(3) | |
| 2 | MTTCs | 16 | |
| 3 | SBIE Rules | ||
| – Foreign rules | 28 | ||
| Stock-based compensation election | – | ||
| Leases | Amendment law, Art 8 | ||
| – Impairment losses inc in tangible asset value | 28(4) | ||
| 4.1 | QDMTT Safe Harbour | 14 | |
| 4.2 | UTPR Safe Harbour | 58 | |
| Third Set of OECD Administrative Guidance | |||
| 1 | Transitional CbCR – Purchase Accounting Adjustments (consistent reporting condition, goodwill impairment adjustment) | Amendment law, Art 18(1) | |
| 2.2.1 | Transitional CbCR – JVs | Amendment law, Art 18(4) | |
| 2.3.1 | Transitional CbCR – Same Financial Statements/Local Financial Statements for Statutory Reporting | Amendment law, Art 18(3) | |
| 2.3.2 | Transitional CbCR – Using different accounting standards | Amendment law, Art 18(3) | |
| 2.3.3 | Transitional CbCR – Adjustments to Qualified Financial Statements/Dividend Mismatches | Amendment law, Art 18(3) | |
| 2.3.4 | Transitional CbCR – MNEs not required to file CbC Reports | Amendment law, Art 18(3) | |
| 2.3.5 | Transitional CbCR – Qualified Financial Statements for PEs | Amendment law, Art 18(3) | |
| 2.4.2 | Transitional CbCR – Treatment of Taxes on income of PEs, CFCs, and Hybrid Entities | Amendment law, Art 18(3) | |
| 2.6 | Transitional CbCR – Treatment of hybrid arbitrage arrangements | Amendment law, Art 18(5) | |
| 3.1 | Identifying Consolidated Revenue | Amendment law, Art 1 ter | |
| 3.2 | Mismatch between Fiscal Years of the UPE and another Constituent Entity | Amendment law, Art 2(1) | |
| 3.3 | Mismatch between Fiscal Year and Tax Year of Constituent Entity | Amendment, Art 2(1) | |
| 4.2.1 | Blended CFCs -multiple GloBE Jurisdictional ETRs | Amendment law, Article 17 | |
| 4.2.2 | Blended CFCs – not required to calculate an ETR | Amendment law, Article 17 | |
| 4.2.3 | Blended CFCs – income of non-GloBE Entities | Amendment law, Article 17 | |
| 5.3 | 30 June 2026 Filing deadline | Amendment law, Article 16 | |
| 6 | NMCE Simplified Calcs | Art 32 | |
| Fourth Set of OECD Administrative Guidance | |||
| 1.2.1 | Aggregate DTL Category basis | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 1.2.1 | Exclusion of certain types of GL accounts and separate tracking | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 1.2.1 | Exclusion of GL accounts that generate standalone DTAs | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 1.2.1 | Exclusion of swinging accounts and separate tracking | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 1.2.2 | FIFO/LIFO Basis | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 1.2.3 | Aggregation of Short-term DTLs | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 1.2.2 | Reversal of DTLs that accrued before the Transition Year | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 1.2.2 | 5 year unclaimed accrual election | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 2.1.2 | Recalculated deferred tax where GloBE carrying value differs from accounting carrying value | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 2.1.2 | GloBE and accounting carrying values and the Transition Rules | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 2.1.2 | Additional provisions for Intragroup transactions accounted for at cost | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 2.1.2 | Exclusion of GloBE carrying value from SBIE | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 3.1.3 | General rules for allocating cross-border, current taxes under a cross-crediting corporate tax system: 4 Steps | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 3.1.3 | Specific rules for foreign PEs/CFCs, Hybrids/rev hybrids with domestic source income | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 3.1.3 | Cross-crediting between Permanent Establishments and distributions from foreign subsidiaries | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 4.1 | Extension of the Substitute Loss Carry-forward DTA to PEs, hybrids and rev hybrids | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 4.2 | Allocation of deferred tax expenses and benefits from a Parent Entity to a CFC, PE Hybrid or Rev Hybrid: 5 step process | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 4.2.2 | Five-Year Election to exclude the allocation of all deferred tax expenses and benefits to CFCs, PEs, Hybrids and Rev Hybrids | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 4.2.3 | Exclusion of deferred tax assets or liabilities arising under a Blended CFC regime from transition rules | Amendment law art 6(2) – subject to regulation | |
| 5.2.2 | Determining GloBE status when a Flow-through Entity is held directly by another Flow-through Entity | Amendment law, Art 2(2) | |
| 5.3.2 | Non-group owners: Partially owned Flow-through Entities | Amendment law, Art 5(1) | |
| 5.3.5 | Non-group owners: Indirect minority ownership | Amendment law, Art 5(1) | |
| 5.4.2 | Taxes allocated to a flow-through entity | Amendment law, art 7(1) | |
| 5.5.2 | Hybrid entities – Taxes pushed down include indirect owners | Amendment law, art 7(2) | |
| 5.5.4 | Hybrid entities – Entities located in jurisdictions without a Corporate Income Tax system | Amendment law, art 7(2) | |
| 5.6.2 | Extension of taxes pushed down to include Reverse Hybrids | Amendment law, art 7(2) | |
| 6.1.4 | Option to exclude a Securitization Entity from scope of QDMTT | ||
| 6.1.4 | Option to not impose top-up tax liabilities on SPVs used in securitization transactions | Amendment Law, Art 12 | |
| 6.1.4 | Amendments to the Switch-Off rule | ||
| 6.1.4 | New definition: Securitization Entity | Amendment law, art 2(4) | |
| 6.1.4 | New definition: Securitization Arrangement | Amendment law, art 2(4) | |
| January 2025 OECD Administrtive Guidance | |||
| 1 | Articles 8.1.4 and 8.1.5 | ||
| 1 | Amendments to CbCR Safe Harbour for 9.1 | Art 9 – July 2025 Draft Law | |
| 1 | Amendments to QDMTT Safe Harbour for 9.1 | Art 5 – July 2025 Draft Law | |
| 1 | Article 9.1 of the GloBE Rules | Art 9 – July 2025 Draft Law | |
| 1 | Central Record of Legislation with Transitional Qualified Status |
| Note | Luxembourg | |
|---|---|---|
| QDMTT?(Enacted/Draft) | Is there a QDMTT in the Legislation? | Yes – Enacted |
| Effective Date: | Accounting periods beginning on or after December 31, 2023 | |
| Administrative Guidance/Safe Harbour Guidance? | Are the provisions of the OECD Administrative Guidance and Safe Harbour Guidance reflected in the current legislation? | Partially |
| Separate/Transposed QDMTT | Is the QDMTT a Separate QDMTT or a Transposition of the GloBE Rules (with Amendments) | Transposed |
| Domestic Groups | A QDMTT can also apply to purely domestic groups. | Yes |
| Scope Definitions | The definitions of Ultimate Parent Entity, MNE Group, and Constituent Entity correspond with the definitions in the GloBE Rules. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Income and covered taxes of Constituent Entities | The QDMTT must compute the tax liability for the jurisdiction by taking into account the income and covered taxes of Constituent Entities under the GloBE Rules. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Separate ETRs | A QDMTT must determine a separate ETR and Top-up Tax amount for MOCEs, Joint Ventures and JV Subsidiaries. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Charging | A QDMTT must impose a Top-up Tax on one or more domestic Constituent Entities on the Excess Profits of all domestic Constituent Entities, including the domestic Parent Entity. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Enforceability | The legal liability for the domestic top-up tax needs to be enforceable against at least one Constituent Entity in the jurisdiction. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Different Accounting Standard? – Optional | Is the use of a local accounting standard optional? | No |
| Different Accounting Standard? – Mandatory | Is the AG2 guidance followed? | Yes – Article 44 (AG2 local accounting standard rule) |
| Different Accounting Standard? – Default GloBE rules | Do the general GloBE rules apply for the QDMTT accounting standard? | No |
| Require 100% ownership? | The QDMTT )can require 100% ownership | Yes – Article 44(4) |
| Differences to GloBE Rules: tighter restriction is consistent with local tax rules | The QDMTT can be more restrictive than the GloBE Rules where the tighter restriction is consistent with local tax rules. | None |
| Differences to GloBE Rules: Not relevant to in the context of its domestic tax system | The QDMTT can exclude adjustments that are not relevant to in the context of its domestic tax system. | None |
| Income/Loss of a PE | The QDMTT must exclude the income or loss of a foreign Permanent Establishment from the income or loss of the Main Entity. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Tax Transparency | A QDMTT must include certain tax transparent provisions. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Adjusted Covered Taxes Consistency | The range of taxes included in Covered Taxes needs to be the same or narrower, as under the GloBE rules. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| GloBE Loss Election? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| No Pushdown to CFC or PE | A QDMTT must exclude: (1) tax paid or incurred by a Constituent Entity-owner under a CFC Tax Regime that is pushed down to a domestic Constituent Entity in the GloBE Rules and (2) tax paid or incurred by a Main Entity that is allocated to a PE in the jurisdiction. | Yes – Article 44(5) |
| Exclude tax allocated to Hybrids | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Article 44(5) |
| Exclude allocated net basis tax on dividends (except WHT) | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Article 44(5) |
| UPE that is a Flow-Through Entity | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| UPE subject to Deductible Dividend Regime | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Eligible Distribution Tax Systems | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| ETR Computation for Investment Entities | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Investment Entity Tax Transparency Election | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Taxable Distribution Method Election | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Multi-Parented MNE Groups | Second AG Guidance | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Additional Top-Up Tax/Excess Negative Tax Expense | A QDMTT needs to have provisions for additional top-up tax where there is no Net GloBE Income and the Adjusted Covered are less than zero and less than the Expected Adjusted Covered Taxes. Amount. Excess Negative Tax Carry-forward rules also need to be in place. | Yes – Article 44(2) |
| Modified Top-Up Tax Formula | The QDMTT top-up tax formula needs to be modified as the GloBE Rules subtract tax paid under a QDMTT from the current GloBE Top-up Tax. | Yes |
| Same Approach As GloBE Rules | A QDMTT must require that top-up tax is taken into account by the relevant Constituent Entity at the same time and in the same manner as under the GloBE Rules (eg it can’t be carried forward). | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| SBIE Included? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| SBIE Rates same as GloBE? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| De Minimis Rule Included? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Restructuring Rules? | A QDMTT needs to include restructuring rules as provided in the GloBE rules to the extent necessary to conform to the tax reorganization rules in the jurisdiction. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Safe Harbours? | A QDMTT needs to contain GloBE safe harbours. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Deferred Tax Transition Rule? | A QDMTT must include the deferred tax starting point under Article 9.1.1 of the Model Rules. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| SBIE Transitional Rates? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Initial Phase of International Activity Exemption | Not Required in QDMTT | Article 11(3) of the Tax amendment law |
| Elections? | Where the GloBE Rules permit an election, a QDMTT must generally also provide for the election and require the MNE Group to make the same election under the QDMTT as is made under the GloBE Rules. | Yes – Transposed under Article 44(2) |
| Deferred Tax transition: First time or refreshing rule? | Second AG | None |
| New transition year – amend tax attributes? | Second AG | None |
| Currency provisions? | Second AG | Amendment law, Art 11(3) |
| DTL Recapture rules – Aggregate DTL Categories | Fourth AG, 1.2.8 | |
| DTL Recapture rules Unclaimed Accrual Five-Year Election | Fourth AG, 1.2.8 | |
| Reverse Hybrid Pushdown | Fourth AG, 5.6.2 | Tax amendment law Art 7(2) |
| Securitization Entities – A QDMTT may also exclude a Securitisation Entity from its scope | Fourth AG, 6.1.4 | |
| Securitization Entities – A jurisdiction may allocate the QDMTT liability for any QDMTT top-up tax to another Constituent Entity (if any) that is located in the jurisdiction | Fourth AG, 6.1.4 | Tax amendment law, Art 12 |
| Note |
| Luxembourg | ||
|---|---|---|
| Effective Date: | Accounting periods beginning on or after December 31, 2023 | |
| Section/Article | ||
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | De Minimis Test | 59(2) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Simplified ETR Test | 59(2) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Routine Profits Test | 59(2) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Simplified Covered Tax defn (inc exclusion of uncertain tax positions) | 59(1)(f) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Simplified ETR defn | 59(1)(e) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Transition Period | 59(1)(g) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Transition Rate | 59(1)(h) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Defn of Qualified Financial Statements | 59(1)(c) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Special Rule for Joint Ventures | 59(4) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Special Rule for Tax Neutral UPEs | 59(5) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Special Rules for Investment Entities and their Constituent Entity-owners | 59(7) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Special Rule for Net Unrealised Fair Value Loss | 59(1)(d) |
| Safe Harbour & Penalty Relief Guidance | Exclusions | 59(9)/(10 |
| December 2023 OECD Administrative Guidance | ||
| 1 | Transitional CbCR – Purchase Accounting Adjustments(consistent reporting condition, goodwill impairment adjustment) | Amendment law, Art 18(1) |
| 2.2.1 | Transitional CbCR – JVs | Amendment law, Art 18(4) |
| 2.3.1 | Transitional CbCR – Same Financial Statements/Local Financial Statements for Statutory Reporting | Amendment law, Art 18(3) |
| 2.3.2 | Transitional CbCR – Using different accounting standards | Amendment law, Art 18(3) |
| 2.3.3 | Transitional CbCR – Adjustments to Qualified Financial Statements/Dividend Mismatches | Amendment law, Art 18(3) |
| 2.3.4 | Transitional CbCR – MNEs not required to file CbC Reports | Amendment law, Art 18(3) |
| 2.3.5 | Transitional CbCR – Qualified Financial Statements for PEs | Amendment law, Art 18(3) |
| 2.4.2 | Transitional CbCR – Treatment of Taxes on income of PEs, CFCs, and Hybrid Entities | Amendment law, Art 18(3) |
| 2.6 | Transitional CbCR – Treatment of hybrid arbitrage arrangements | Amendment law, Art 18(5) |
| January 2025 OECD Administrtive Guidance | ||
| Amendments to CbCR Safe Harbour for 9.1 |
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |