| Status | Draft Law |
| Law | Draft Minimum Tax Law of October 5, 2025 |
| Effective Date | Financial years beginning on or after January 1, 2026 |
| IIR | No |
| UTPR | No |
| QDMTT | Yes |
| Filing Deadlines | Standard |
| Safe Harbours | Yes (transposed but subject to a Ministry of Finance Decree) |
On October 5, 2025, Israel published a draft law for consultation for a QDMTT from 2026.
GLOBE APPLICATION
General
The draft law does not attempt to redraft the OECD Model Rules, instead it transposes the OECD Model Rules into Israeli law by way of a direct static reference in Sections 3 and 4. The OECD Model Rules (translated to Hebrew) are provided as an appendix to the draft law.
The implementation of the Pillar Two rules via a static reference to the OECD Model Rules means that if the OECD Model Rules were to change, the law may need to be amended.
Section 3 of the draft law also provides that the OECD Commentary and Administrative Guidance must be taken into account as part of the interpretation. The Explanatory Notes to the draft law state that this is intended to ensure that the implementation of the law in Israel will be carried out in full uniformity with the other countries that have chosen to implement the rules, while creating a uniform standard that allows for easy implementation of the rules by multinational groups.
This makes the Israel Pillar Two law much shorter than the EU legislation and other jurisdictions that apply full-form legislation.
Section 4(d) of the draft law provides that the Minister of Finance may issue further rules relating to:
-Specific deviations from the OECD Model Rules, as permitted under the OECD Administrative Guidance;
-Safe Harbours;
-Currency conversion rules; and
-Further guidance on the QDMTT calculation.
Administrative Guidance
The OECD Commentary, including OECD Administrative Guidance is taken into account under Section 3 of the draft law when applying the Pillar Two GloBE Rules.
Safe Harbour and Penalty Relief Guidance
Whilst the OECD Safe Harbours are not specifically mentioned in the draft law, as the OECD Model Rules and Administrative Guidance and other OECD Commentary are applied in Israel, the OECD Safe Harbours should be applicable (where relevant). However, Section 4(d) of the draft law provides that the Minister of Finance is to issue further guidance on the application of Safe Harbours.
ELECTIONS
Elections in the OECD Model Rules
As the OECD Model Rules are transposed into domestic Israeli law, all GloBE elections in the OECD Model Rules should apply.
Elections in the Administrative Guidance
As detailed in Section 3.2 the elections in the OECD Administrative Guidance should apply in Israel.
NEW ELECTIONS
No new elections are provided in the Israeli draft law.
DEVIATIONS FROM THE OECD MODEL RULES/EU GLOBAL MINIMUM TAX DIRECTIVE
The fact that the OECD Model Rules are incorporated by a static reference means that much of the detailed application rules and definitions are not included in the Pillar Two law.
The static reference includes reference to the Commentary and other relevant OECD Guidance. As such the application of the rules in Israel will conform to the OECD approach.
DOMESTIC MINIMUM TAX
General
The draft law provides for a domestic minimum tax, which is intended to be a QDMTT.
QDMTT Design Features
As the draft law applies the OECD Model Rules and Administrative Guidance, the application of the domestic minimum tax and it’s specific calculation features will be in accordance with the OECD rules.
However, the only specific amendment of the OECD Model Rules relates to the exclusion of the QDMTT from the calculation of the top-up tax in Section 2 of the draft law. This is required to avoid circularity (as the OECD Model Rules applies the top-up tax calculation for IIR/UTPR purposes and deducts QDMTT from the tax amount, this is not required for the QDMTT calculation). Other mandatory and optional deviations in the OECD Administrative Guidance are not yet included (eg there are no rules for CFC pushdowns). However, Section 4(d) of the draft law provides that the Minister of Finance is to issue further guidance on the deviations from the OECD Model Rules.
Given the draft law applies the OECD Model Rules for the QDMTT calculation, it is expected that the accounting standard used for the Israeli QDMTT will be based on the default GloBE rules (ie the UPEs accounting standard unless this is not reasonably practicable) unless otherwise stated in forthcoming Ministry of Finance guidance.
Section 4(b) of the draft law provides that instead of the QDMTT being calculated on an entity basis, a jurisdictional blending approach can apply with individual Israeli entities being liable for the QDMTT on a proportional basis calculated at the level of the MNE group in Israel.
Where this method is applied, where there are multiple Israeli entities of the MNE group in Israel, jurisdictional blending will apply to consolidate the ETR to offset entities with a higher ETR against entities with a lower ETR.
The top-up tax will be attributed to each of the entities in the group based on the the ratio of the GloBE income of the Israeli entities to the group GloBE income. Note that top-up tax will not be attributed to loss-making entities.
The Explanatory Notes to the draft Law state that they expect the vast majority of groups operating in Israel that consist of multiple entities will choose this approach.
This approach is conditional on a designated entity being selected and the designated entity submitting a consolidated report to the Tax Authority.
Registration
Not provided.
Filing
Section 5(a) of the draft law requires the submission of a QDMTT return within 15 months following the end of the fiscal year (18 months in the first year).
However, Section 5(b) of the draft law provides that where there are multiple Israeli entities of an MNE group subject to the QDMTT, they can nominate a designated entity for filing and payment purposes. The QDMTT return will detail the method of calculating the top-up tax for the MNE group in Israel and the tax for each Israeli entity.
Payment
Section 8 of the draft law provides that payment of top-up tax must be made by the deadline for filing the QDMTT Return.
Penalties
Section 12 of the draft law provides that that failure to submit a QDMTT Return can result in a penalty of 150,000 shekels for each full month of delay.
None issued.
None
| Note | Israel | |
|---|---|---|
| QDMTT?(Enacted/Draft) | Is there a QDMTT in the Legislation? | Draft Law |
| Effective Date: | January 1, 2026 | |
| Administrative Guidance/Safe Harbour Guidance? | Are the provisions of the OECD Administrative Guidance and Safe Harbour Guidance reflected in the current legislation? | Ye |
| Separate/Transposed QDMTT | Is the QDMTT a Separate QDMTT or a Transposition of the GloBE Rules (with Amendments) | Transposed |
| Domestic Groups | A QDMTT can also apply to purely domestic groups. | No |
| Scope Definitions | The definitions of Ultimate Parent Entity, MNE Group, and Constituent Entity correspond with the definitions in the GloBE Rules. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Income and covered taxes of Constituent Entities | The QDMTT must compute the tax liability for the jurisdiction by taking into account the income and covered taxes of Constituent Entities under the GloBE Rules. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Separate ETRs | A QDMTT must determine a separate ETR and Top-up Tax amount for MOCEs, Joint Ventures and JV Subsidiaries. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Charging | A QDMTT must impose a Top-up Tax on one or more domestic Constituent Entities on the Excess Profits of all domestic Constituent Entities, including the domestic Parent Entity. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Enforceability | The legal liability for the domestic top-up tax needs to be enforceable against at least one Constituent Entity in the jurisdiction. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Different Accounting Standard? – Optional | Is the use of a local accounting standard optional? | No |
| Different Accounting Standard? – Mandatory | Is the AG2 guidance followed? | No |
| Different Accounting Standard? – Default GloBE rules | Do the general GloBE rules apply for the QDMTT accounting standard? | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Require 100% ownership? | The QDMTT )can require 100% ownership | No |
| Differences to GloBE Rules: tighter restriction is consistent with local tax rules | The QDMTT can be more restrictive than the GloBE Rules where the tighter restriction is consistent with local tax rules. | No |
| Differences to GloBE Rules: Not relevant to in the context of its domestic tax system | The QDMTT can exclude adjustments that are not relevant to in the context of its domestic tax system. | No |
| Income/Loss of a PE | The QDMTT must exclude the income or loss of a foreign Permanent Establishment from the income or loss of the Main Entity. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Tax Transparency | A QDMTT must include certain tax transparent provisions. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Adjusted Covered Taxes Consistency | The range of taxes included in Covered Taxes needs to be the same or narrower, as under the GloBE rules. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| GloBE Loss Election? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| No Pushdown to CFC or PE | A QDMTT must exclude: (1) tax paid or incurred by a Constituent Entity-owner under a CFC Tax Regime that is pushed down to a domestic Constituent Entity in the GloBE Rules and (2) tax paid or incurred by a Main Entity that is allocated to a PE in the jurisdiction. | No |
| Exclude tax allocated to Hybrids | Second AG Guidance | No |
| Exclude allocated net basis tax on dividends (except WHT) | Second AG Guidance | No |
| UPE that is a Flow-Through Entity | Second AG Guidance | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| UPE subject to Deductible Dividend Regime | Second AG Guidance | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Eligible Distribution Tax Systems | Second AG Guidance | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| ETR Computation for Investment Entities | Second AG Guidance | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Investment Entity Tax Transparency Election | Second AG Guidance | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Taxable Distribution Method Election | Second AG Guidance | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Multi-Parented MNE Groups | Second AG Guidance | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Additional Top-Up Tax/Excess Negative Tax Expense | A QDMTT needs to have provisions for additional top-up tax where there is no Net GloBE Income and the Adjusted Covered are less than zero and less than the Expected Adjusted Covered Taxes. Amount. Excess Negative Tax Carry-forward rules also need to be in place. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Modified Top-Up Tax Formula | The QDMTT top-up tax formula needs to be modified as the GloBE Rules subtract tax paid under a QDMTT from the current GloBE Top-up Tax. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Same Approach As GloBE Rules | A QDMTT must require that top-up tax is taken into account by the relevant Constituent Entity at the same time and in the same manner as under the GloBE Rules (eg it can’t be carried forward). | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| SBIE Included? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| SBIE Rates same as GloBE? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| De Minimis Rule Included? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Restructuring Rules? | A QDMTT needs to include restructuring rules as provided in the GloBE rules to the extent necessary to conform to the tax reorganization rules in the jurisdiction. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Safe Harbours? | A QDMTT needs to contain GloBE safe harbours. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Deferred Tax Transition Rule? | A QDMTT must include the deferred tax starting point under Article 9.1.1 of the Model Rules. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| SBIE Transitional Rates? | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Initial Phase of International Activity Exemption | Not Required in QDMTT | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Elections? | Where the GloBE Rules permit an election, a QDMTT must generally also provide for the election and require the MNE Group to make the same election under the QDMTT as is made under the GloBE Rules. | Yes, transposed under Section 2 |
| Deferred Tax transition: First time or refreshing rule? | Second AG | No |
| New transition year – amend tax attributes? | Second AG | No |
| Currency provisions? | Second AG | No |
| DTL Recapture rules – Aggregate DTL Categories | Fourth AG, 1.2.8 | No |
| DTL Recapture rules Unclaimed Accrual Five-Year Election | Fourth AG, 1.2.8 | No |
| Reverse Hybrid Pushdown | Fourth AG, 5.6.2 | No |
| Securitization Entities – A QDMTT may also exclude a Securitisation Entity from its scope | Fourth AG, 6.1.4 | No |
| Securitization Entities – A jurisdiction may allocate the QDMTT liability for any QDMTT top-up tax to another Constituent Entity (if any) that is located in the jurisdiction | Fourth AG, 6.1.4 | No |
| Note | No |
None
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |