Paraguay stands out amongst most South American countries as being the one most at risk of substantial jurisdictional top-up tax for in-scope groups under Pillar Two.
Its standard rate of corporate income tax is 10% under Article 21 of Law No. 6,380/19 on the Modernization and Simplification of the National Tax System. This is in contrast to other South American jurisdictions that have much higher standard rates of corporate income tax, such as:
Brazil – 34%
Argentina – 35%
Chile – 27%
Peru – 29.5%
Columbia – 35%
Venezuela – 34%
Guyana – 40%
Mexico – 30%
Nicaragua – 30%
Ecuador – 25%
Bolivia – 25%
Uruguay – 25%
Article 1 of Law No. 6,380/19 on the Modernization and Simplification of the National Tax System establishes a territorial basis for corporate income tax in Paraguay. As such, only income from Paraguayan sources is taxable, subject to a number of exceptions. For instance, Article 6 of Law 6,380/19 provides that Paraguayan source income includes:
If you haven’t got a subscription you can join up below.
On May 2, 2024, the Estonian Official Gazette enacted the ‘Act supplementing the Tax Information Exchange Act, the Tax Administration Act and the Income Tax Act’ to implement Article 50 of the EU Minimum Tax Directive.
Analysis of the implementation of the Pillar Two GloBE rules for Canada, updated for the Budget Implementation Bill, 2024, No. 1, issued on April 30, 2024.
Whether multinationals adopt a centralized or decentralized approach to Pillar Two will be one of the key factors in correctly establishing the systems and architecture to collect, manage, analyse and store source data for the Pillar Two effective tax rate and top-up tax calculation.
The Pillar Two effective tax rate (ETR) calculation for investment entities is similar to the standard ETR calculation, however, there is an important twist in that the top-up tax is adjusted for minority interests. There is no adjustment for minority interests under the standard ETR calculation. In this article we look at the impact of this.
On April 25, 2024, the Polish Ministry of Finance issued a draft law to implement the EU Minimum Tax Directive into domestic law. Read our review of the draft law.
The tax data mapping assessment is the cornerstone for MNEs looking to implement an effective approach to manage Pillar Two. All systems changes flow from this.
Analysis of the domestic implementation of the Pillar Two Global Minimum Tax rules in Barbados for accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2024. Updated for the draft legislation being considered by the Barbadian Parliament.
The Pillar Two rules include specific rules for Joint Ventures (JVs) that would otherwise not be within the scope of Pillar Two due to not being consolidated in the financial accounts of the MNE group. However, of more interest is how the amount of top-tax tax (and by implication the amount not collected) varies depending on the JV group structure. Read more in this article.
MNE groups should pay careful attention to any group financing companies in light of the Pillar Two Rules. In this analysis we look at the impact of Pillar Two under for both general GloBE and QDMTT purposes.
On March 22, 2024, the Decree of the Ministry of Economy and Finance No. 1048, to amend the Enforcement Regulations of the International Tax Adjustment Act entered into force.
On March 22, 2024, the Enforcement Regulations to the International Tax Adjustment Act were amended. This includes attachments for the GIR (in English and Korean), the GloBE Tax Return and the Notification Form for a Foreign CE to File the GIR.
Whilst the OECD Model Rules require the application of the IIR to Low-Taxed Constituent Entities outside the jurisdiction, the Commentary permits the application of the IIR domestically (a ‘DIIR’). Both New Zealand and the EU apply a DIIR.
This website is not affiliated with or related to the OECD. We provide independent insights and analysis on the OECD Two-Pillar Solution
© 2024 OECDPillars
All Rights Reserved
