Once the top-up tax for the jurisdiction has been calculated, it is then allocated to the constituent entities in the jurisdiction that have net Pillar Two GloBE income (ie not entities that have Pillar Two GloBE losses) so that the charging provisions (ie the income inclusion rule or under-taxed payments rule) can correctly apply.
Note, that if all of the constituent entities in the jurisdiction are wholly owned and the UPE is applying an income inclusion rule, the allocation amongst constituent entities wouldn’t be required given the UPE would simply account for the top-up tax.
Article 5.2.4 of the OECD Model Rules provide that the allocation is based on each relevant constituent entity’s share of the total net Pillar Two GloBE income of the jurisdiction.
Example
In jurisdiction X:
Company A has net Pillar Two GloBE income of 5 million
Company B has net Pillar Two GloBE income of 10 million
Company C has net Pillar Two GloBE income of 20 million
Company D has a net Pillar Two GloBE loss of 5 million
Total jurisdictional top-up tax is 5 million. This is allocated as follows:
Company A = 5 million * 5/35 = 714,286
Company B = 5 million * 10/35 =1,428,571
Company C = 5 million * 20/35 =2,857,143
Company D = 0
On 18 September 2026, Brazil issued IN RFB No. 2,342/2026 to introduce a new framework for the treatment of substance-based tax incentives under its Pillar Two rules.
On 15 September 2026, the Dutch government presented a bill that would introduce four new Pillar Two safe harbours, extend the Transitional Country-by-Country Reporting Safe Harbour and amend the treatment of certain 52- and 53-week accounting periods.
On September 11, 2026, the OECD released a package of guidance and implementation materials that provides for the exclusion of Explicitly Conditional Taxes from Covered Taxes, clarifies the treatment of mismatched fiscal periods under the Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Tax Safe Harbour, updates the GloBE Information Return and establishes the detailed framework for full legislative reviews of domestic minimum tax rules.
Uruguay’s presidential decree dated 31 August 2026 replaces the conditional QDMTT payment waiver in Decree No. 325/025 with a compensation mechanism. Article 1 requires in-scope constituent entities allocated QDMTT in Uruguay to comply with its QDMTT obligations and pay the tax; article 7 repeals the earlier decree.
Qatar has published six decisions dealing with currency conversion, simplified reporting, the Transitional CbCR Safe Harbour, non-material constituent entities, designated local entities and registration.
The Slovak Government has approved draft legislation that would make significant changes to Slovakia’s qualified domestic minimum top-up tax regime. The proposals would implement the OECD’s new Substance-Based Tax Incentives Safe Harbour, extend the Transitional CbCR Safe Harbour and introduce rules preserving Pillar Two filing and payment obligations where a Slovak taxpayer ceases to exist without a legal successor.
Cyprus has opened a public consultation on amendments to its Pillar Two legislation intended to address observations from the European Commission and align the domestic rules more closely with OECD guidance. The consultation opened on 30 July 2026 and is scheduled to close on 5 September 2026.
On August 7, 2026, Germany published a regulation that gives domestic legal effect to a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction list of qualifying Pillar Two jurisdictions.
On August 8, 2026, Mauritius issued its QDMTT regulations to implement its QDMTT.
This website is not affiliated with or related to the OECD. We provide independent insights and analysis on the OECD Two-Pillar Solution
© 2026 OECDPillars.com
All Rights Reserved