Pillar Two: Trusts and Foundations

Article 10 of the OECD Model Rules defines an entity as either: 

– a legal person (except an individual); or

– any arrangement that prepares separate financial accounts.

Note that the First Set of OECD Administrative Guidance also excludes government agencies (both central and local government) that carry out government functions.

The first limb above would generally catch foundations, whilst the second would catch trusts. 

This means that trusts and foundations are squarely within the Pillar Two rules and could be a low-taxed entity, an intermediate entity/partially owned parent entity or even an ultimate parent entity (UPE). 

Under Article 1.4.1 of the OECD Model Rules, a UPE for the Pillar Two rules is:

  • an entity that owns directly or indirectly a controlling interest in another entity; and
  • is not owned, with a controlling interest, directly or indirectly by another entity.

Whether a trust is a UPE is an important consideration as (1) in many cases the UPE is required to apply the income inclusion rule to account for top-up tax and (2) the definition of an MNE group hinges on the relationship between the group companies and the UPE.

For instance, take this scenario:

image showing example group structure of a trust owning parent entities with a title stating ' Pillar Two - Trusts and Foundations'

Determining if the trust was the UPE could result in all companies then potentially being within the scope of the Pillar Two rules (subject to any specific exclusions etc). Aside from the application of Pillar Two to the group, the trust could then be liable to account for top-up tax.

This in itself could create issues.

The definition of a group in the Pillar Two rules relies on accounting principles so that there is a group if there is a requirement to prepare consolidated financial statements.

Whilst a trust or foundation may not usually have to prepare consolidated financial statements under an accounting standard, the Pillar Two rules go further.

Article 10 of the OECD Model Rules states that if no consolidated financial statements are prepared a deeming provision applies so that the entity must prepare hypothetical consolidated financial statements as if it was required to prepare them in accordance with an Authorised Financial Accounting Standard that is either an Acceptable Financial Accounting Standard or another financial accounting standard.

As such, a trust or foundation would need to determine if it would be required to prepare accounting standards under an accounting standard.

This would again depend on accounting principles.

Under IFRS for instance, there is a requirement to consolidate if the trust or foundation possesses power over the parent entities, has exposure to variable returns from its involvement with them and has the ability to use its power over them to affect its returns.

Latest Articles

Cyprus Flag

Cyprus Pillar Two: First-Year GIR Filing Route, Notifications and Forms

On June 15, 2026, the Cyprus Tax Department issued two announcements on the domestic implementation of the Pillar Two framework. The first concerned the European Commission’s position on Cyprus’ Income Inclusion Rule (IIR). The second addressed filing deadlines and compliance obligations for Cypriot constituent entities and joint ventures under Law 151(I)/2024.

Read More »
EU flag

The EU’s new Pillar Two compliance manual

On June 10, 2026, the EU issued the ‘Manual for MNE Groups on Global Minimum Tax (Pillar Two) Compliance Obligations‘. This provides country level analysis of Pillar Two filings in Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Sweden.

Read More »
Dutch Flag

Dutch GIR Filing: A Practical Guide

A practical overview of the Dutch GloBE Information Return (GIR) filing process, including BIA terminology, deadlines, XML format, Digipoort submission, security, validation, notification obligations and governance controls.

Read More »